|
|
|
|
|
Technical article dealing with gable abutments and cavity walls
|
|
This article
originally appeared within the Clerk of Works magazine ‘Site Recorder’ and
is reproduced with the permission of the author
|
|
Is The Kitchen
Too Hot Chef?
Some years ago I was on site to advise why
the stepped and staggered gable abutments between houses were suffering
dampness. Indeed, the problem was so widespread in excess of fifty households
had complained. It would be inappropriate to name the company responsible for
the site of over 200 units but it is known nationally.
Henry was the name of the person overseeing
the design and specification of work of the developer. He explained the gable
abutments had been constructed incorporating traditional roll dpc and a stepped
running lead flashing. He went on to add that the houses had been constructed
to the usual design detail and specification used on all their houses built
throughout the UK. Why then were the gables on this particular site damp?
One of the immediate answers was staring us
in the face. This site was exposed, and by exposed I mean built off steeply
rising ground facing seaward. The area was known to be both wet and gusty in
the winter months. I asked many questions, making notes as the answers were
received. I then asked the obvious: ‘ If this site has been constructed to your
usual specification, have you or are you experiencing problems elsewhere?’
Following some hesitation the response was unbelievable:
‘Well, yes we
do have other sites with similar problems, but not affecting as many units as
we have on this one….and generally our specification functions. It’s only when
properties come under pressure with bad weather that the gables leak – otherwise
they’re OK’.
I thought about this last sentence. It took
some believing. ‘It’s
only when properties come under pressure with really bad weather that the
gables leak – otherwise they’re OK’.
I had a mental picture of a trading
standards officer chastising the company for not being more truthful with its
advertising. But perhaps it is difficult to sell new homes as being ‘
watertight as long as the weather is not too bad’?
My mind raced to what might happen if Henry
decided on a career change and became an aircraft pilot? Would he announce the
plane would crash only if bad weather was encountered?
Perhaps he might instead become a chef?
Food poisoning occurs only if the kitchen is under pressure?
We inspected fifteen of the units. Masonry
had been removed and it was clear the dpc and flashing arrangement was
inadequate. I suspected it functioned to an extent that minimised water ingress
but could not arrest it and prevent it permeating inwardly. In most situations
the ingress went unnoticed affecting the masonry within the attic space only.
But in exposed situations the dampness permeated further. Thus it was no
longer out of sight – out of mind? The dpc lacked a watertight inboard upstand
and the shape of the dpc varied from one course to the next. The stepped
running lead flashing had been introduced in 1.8 metre lengths, but the
tuck-ins failed to always unite with the dpc. Of course, being a running
flashing it lacked any overlap or secondary layering. Therefore any wind-driven
rain that blew under the stepped leading edge was in immediate contact with the
very masonry that was supposed to be kept dry.
For a stepped or staggered gable abutment
to be protected against rain permeating and descending below the roofline
(where it becomes an internal skin of the abutting property), any damp
protection system must follow the pitch of the roof. The arrangement resembles
the profile of a staircase – with connecting treads and connecting risers.
This protection must then link with an
appropriate flashing to weatherproof the physical join between masonry and roof
finish. By so doing the requirements of the Building Regulations can be
satisfied.
(Picture right –
typical stepped abutments correctly executed)
The developer in question decided to insert
preformed trays into the gable masonry and the exercise eliminated all the damp
penetration problems. The tray inserted was the Type X cavitray with attached
lead flashing manufactured by Cavity Trays of Yeovil. (The Type X has Local
Authority Building Control National Type Approval). Since using the Type X
cavitray for corrective purposes and subsequent new build applications, there
has been a dramatic fall in maintenance costs as damp penetration of gable
walls no longer features in the snagging list.
The Type X is just one of the products
awarded European Technical Approval, and Cavity Trays Ltd is the only tray
manufacturer in Europe awarded this commendable standard. Cavity Trays is also
alone in supplying cavitrays with a product performance liability warranty – of
particular attraction to Architects, Builders and Clients who appreciate and
value peace of mind.
When it comes to gable abutments, Henry is
now exceedingly well informed. And if you are preparing to fly away on holiday
or eat out tonight, do relax. Henry is still employed by the developer!
Eight hours after it stopped raining,
dampness is evident in the gable masonry of this typical development. (This is
not the development referred to in this article).
Once saturation point is reached,
cement-based reconstructed stone of this style can discharge into the cavity in
excess of two litres of water per sq metre per hour.

The Type X cavitray with its own attached
lead flashing solved all the gable damp penetration problems on the site. The
self-adjusting and self-supporting cavity upstand permits the tray to fit all
popular cavity widths. Compatibility is thus ensured.

An extract from the Cavity Trays Ltd survey into damp
problems
affecting sloping abutments in the UK.
The pie chart provides an analysis of
faults. The programme of investigations is ongoing and Cavity Trays Ltd
regularly issues updated data. Please refer to Cavity Trays Ltd publications
for the latest information.